Development of a reference site network for invertebrate monitoring of wadeable streams in the Waikato
Report: TR05/29
Author: Kevin Collier, Johlene Kelly (Environment Waikato), Andy Haigh (GIServices)
Abstract
Every year Environment Waikato carries out state of the environment monitoring at over 100 stream and river sites throughout the Region, referred to as the Regional Ecological Monitoring of Streams (REMS) programme, using stream invertebrates as indicators of ecological condition. A review of the REMS programme in 2001 highlighted significant inadequacies in the number, geographic spread and selection of reference sites, short-comings that impeded comparisons of similar types of streams within and between ecoregions.
The following report describes the steps taken to identify accessible sections of wadeable streams (order 1-4) suitable for the REMS reference site network, stratified by four regionally dominant stream types and seven zones within the region. Use of GIS linked to stream typology, available spatial databases and aerial photography greatly enhanced the objectivity and efficiency of reference site selection.
Significant differences in invertebrate community composition were evident among some of the zones and stream types identified a priori, providing qualified support for the typology and spatial framework used in reference site selection. Variability among stream types was reduced using a multivariate analysis of a range standardised condition and diversity metrics derived from the invertebrate data. The metrics total sample richness, Margalef diversity, EPT richness and % EPT (both excluding Hydroptilidae), % dominant taxon, and MCI and QMCI were all found to have low variability among reference sites and were recommended for use in future analyses. A core set of 26 reference sites was identified as suitable for wadeable stream monitoring in the future.
Contents | ||
Acknowledgements | iii | |
1 | Introduction | 1 |
2 | Methods | 1 |
2.1 | Background | 1 |
2.2 | Representing geographic spread and stream type | 2 |
2.3 | Site identification | 5 |
2.4 | Site selection and verification | 9 |
2.5 | Field sampling | 11 |
2.6 | Data analysis | 12 |
3 | Results | 13 |
3.1 | Representativeness of sites | 13 |
3.2 | Physico-chemical characteristics | 17 |
3.3 | Invertebrate communities | 18 |
Conclusions | 26 | |
References | 27 | |
Appendix 1 | 29 | |
Appendix 2 | 31 | |
Appendix 3 | 33 |
To ask for help or report a problem, contact us
Tell us how we can improve the information on this page. (optional)